<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Accretus Solutions Blog &#187; Asset allocation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.accretus.in/tag/asset-allocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.accretus.in</link>
	<description>Managing Wealth in the New Normal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to preserve wealth for generations</title>
		<link>http://blog.accretus.in/wealth-transfer/how-to-preserve-wealth-for-generations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.accretus.in/wealth-transfer/how-to-preserve-wealth-for-generations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Partha Iyengar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wealth Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi generation wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.accretus.in/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Post Lehman Crisis in Sep 2008, wealth preservation and management for the present and future has attained greater significance. 
Research has shown that 9 out of 10 families loses all wealth by the 3rd Generation.
Multiple reasons assigned to it are :
1.	Poor investment choices
2.	Prolonged period of high inflation during a particular time horizon
3.	Higher taxes
4.	Higher spending by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post Lehman Crisis in Sep 2008, wealth preservation and management for the present and future has attained greater significance. </p>
<p>Research has shown that 9 out of 10 families loses all wealth by the 3rd Generation.<br />
Multiple reasons assigned to it are :<br />
1.	Poor investment choices<br />
2.	Prolonged period of high inflation during a particular time horizon<br />
3.	Higher taxes<br />
4.	Higher spending by the younger generation in the family<br />
5.	Family extension over a period of time.<br />
6.     Protracted Legal battles between family members</p>
<p>One of the simple ways to help transfer, build and preserve the family’s wealth is creating ‘Multiple Portfolios’ for you and your family.</p>
<p>The first step towards creating multiple portfolios is to identify you and your spouse’s needs to cover your personal life style expenses.<br />
This would be the core portfolio that needs to be created to withstand all market conditions and last through your life time. One may also add an emergency reserve fund to cushion the portfolio during extreme events that could last for many years.<br />
The core portfolio would be the corner stone for all planning purposes, since it would give you and your spouse the financial security during your life time. The Allocation for this core portfolio would be a conservative one skewed towards liquid and traditional asset classes. This amount would need to be always there in the estate.</p>
<p>The second step would be to identify goals for your children, grand children, others in the family and philanthropy. This would form a set of satellite portfolios that would have to be created to meet the respective goals.<br />
Based on the time frame of the goals and risk profile of the individual family member, the portfolios could be conservative, balanced or aggressive.<br />
For instance, children and other family members&#8217; regular expenses could have a conservative portfolio, whereas their education and other goals could be a balanced or aggressive portfolio depending on the time horizon to reach their goals. </p>
<p>It is crucial to identify the timing of the transfer of the satellite portfolio’s capital from the core portfolio and develop strategies to move it.</p>
<p>The sound cash flow management and clear investment strategies helps to meet expenses on a regular basis as well as to fulfill the many aspirations of the family members . At this stage, it is equally important to establish appropriate wills/trusts to transfer assets at the right time that reduces large tax out flows for your family members. </p>
<p>The third step is to implement investment strategies for both core &#038; satellite portfolio, monitor and actively manage it.</p>
<p>Many Indian families have their wealth tied into the business. It is important to create &#8216;liquidity&#8217; and carve out assets to meet the financial goals of the families. We believe, if the wealth transfer and estate planning strategies are planned and implemented early on, there is a fair chance to retain wealth for multiple generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.accretus.in/wealth-transfer/how-to-preserve-wealth-for-generations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Asset Allocation fail during the Financial Crisis?</title>
		<link>http://blog.accretus.in/asset-allocation/did-asset-allocation-fail-during-the-financial-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.accretus.in/asset-allocation/did-asset-allocation-fail-during-the-financial-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>srinivasa sharan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asset allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.accretus.in/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been extensive debate over the last couple of years on  whether asset allocation did its job during the financial crisis of  2008-09. Between Mid &#8211; 2008 and early 2009 there was a decline in prices  of most popular asset classes (Equities, Corporate Bonds, Real Estate).  The recent financial crisis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been extensive debate over the last couple of years on  whether asset allocation did its job during the financial crisis of  2008-09. Between Mid &#8211; 2008 and early 2009 there was a decline in prices  of most popular asset classes (Equities, Corporate Bonds, Real Estate).  The recent financial crisis we think has not undermined the overall  concept of asset allocation but has definitely driven a need to review  and update the concept of asset allocation.</p>
<p>In September 2008 the failure of investment bank Lehman Brothers set  off a negative domino effect across various asset classes with the  exception of US Treasury Bonds and Cash. The bedrock on which Asset  Allocation rests &#8211; different asset classes perform differently at  various times in an economic cycle was undermined. This meant that  conventional Asset Allocation also had to include some form of insurance  which was guaranteed to perform well in a market crisis.This could have  been in the form of deep out of the money put options on the stock  market benchmarks which would have protected investors from the severe  losses they experienced (similar to protecting another valuable asset &#8211;  an automobile).</p>
<p>Investors must also focus on moving from a framework of Static Asset  Allocation (i.e predetermined allocation percentages across asset  classes) to Dynamic Asset Allocation. This would involve setting a wide  range for Asset Allocation to particular Asset Classes with some form of  valuation/ economic cycle based method to move to the lower or higher  end of the range. For example if it were determined that an investor  needs to maintain a 60 percent allocation to Equity, on the basis of  where the market was trading on a historical valuation basis, Equity  Allocation would be higher at 70 percent (if the market were trading at  low valuations) or 40 percent (if the market were trading  at high  valuations).</p>
<p>The third update on Asset Allocation would be to also evaluate  concentration of Assets in particular sub- asset classes and make  changes in these exposures to reduce portfolio risk. To follow up on the  previous example this would be akin to reducing investments in Banks or  Financial Services companies when there is an increased likelihood of  an economic recession with a commensurate increase in investments in  defensive FMCG companies. In Debt Asset Allocation this is akin to  reducing investments in corporate bonds and increasing investments in  Government securities on expectations of an economic slowdown.</p>
<p>To conclude while the market crisis of 2008-09 has prompted a review  of Asset Allocation, we believe it still works in an updated form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.accretus.in/asset-allocation/did-asset-allocation-fail-during-the-financial-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

